From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 7 3:34:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (discworld.nanolink.com [217.75.135.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BE5A37B409 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 03:34:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 59478 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Aug 2001 10:33:21 -0000 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:33:21 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Akinori MUSHA Cc: Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nakai@FreeBSD.ORG, dr@domix.de, demon@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, mi@aldan.algebra.com, ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, roman@xpert.com, greg@hewgill.com, jedgar@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@goldmoon.org, dirk@FreeBSD.ORG, kanou@mil.allnet.ne.jp Subject: Re: Introducing USE_BZIP2{CMD,LIB,RUN} and BZIP2BASE Message-ID: <20010807133321.D54952@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Akinori MUSHA , Maxim Sobolev , portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, nakai@FreeBSD.ORG, dr@domix.de, demon@FreeBSD.ORG, gnome@FreeBSD.ORG, mi@aldan.algebra.com, ijliao@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, roman@xpert.com, greg@hewgill.com, jedgar@FreeBSD.ORG, jmz@FreeBSD.ORG, samy@goldmoon.org, dirk@FreeBSD.ORG, kanou@mil.allnet.ne.jp References: <200108071003.f77A3nF64150@vega.vega.com> <867kwgjh5b.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <867kwgjh5b.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@iDaemons.org on Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 07:31:12PM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 07:31:12PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > At Tue, 7 Aug 2001 13:03:09 +0300 (EEST), > sobomax wrote: > > I do not see any problems with retiring bzip2 port in my variant - > > when the time has came just remove archivers/bzip2 and its traces > > in RUN/LIB/BUILD_DEPENDS of various ports. The former is common > > for both scenarios, while you have to do the latter at the beginning > > of your scenario anyway (i.e. convert RUN/LIB/BUILD_DEPENDS into > > various USE_*). > > 1. It's still uglier. We don't need such kind of kludgy symlinks. > Introducing BZIP2BASE is cleaner and matches the reality. > > 2. USE_BZIP2 implies EXTRACT_SUFX=.tar.bz2 and EXTRACT_CMD=bzip2 but > which are sometimes unwanted. Introducing USE_BZIP2CMD will solve > this cleanly. FWIW, I agree heartily with this point - there *is* software out there that only needs libbz2. > 3. It'd be better to be consistent with what we are doing for OpenSSL. > > 4. You didn't object but agreed when we changed bsd.port.mk not to > depend on archivers/bzip2 if the system has /usr/bin/bzip2. G'luck, Peter -- If you think this sentence is confusing, then change one pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message