From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 09:41:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0585116A4CE; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ew.co.za (g2.endorphinweb.co.za [196.41.15.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0531B43D48; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@mnet-online.de) X-Scanned-By: This message was scanned by EW virus scanning services (www.ew.co.za) Received: from [62.245.241.142] (unverified [62.245.241.142]) by ew.co.za (SurgeMail 2.2c10) with ESMTP id 18204 for multiple; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 11:41:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AE6@mvaexch01.acuson.com> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AE6@mvaexch01.acuson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2813D6A9-7CDA-11D9-8FA0-000A95D5F764@mnet-online.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stephan Lichtenauer Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:40:40 +0100 To: Johnson David X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com X-Authenticated-User: s01@lichtenauer.co.za cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.3: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:41:54 -0000 Am 12.02.2005 um 00:00 schrieb Johnson David: > From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr] >> >> Because FreeBSD is a server, not a desktop. > > Agree and disagree. While FreeBSD is well suited for the server, it's > also > well suited for the desktop. That doesn't mean that we should be > stressing > the desktop to those shopping for servers, instead it means that we > shouldn't be telling those shopping for desktops to go use Linux > instead. > How many business will be running Linux on the desktop but FreeBSD on > the > server? None! > > Currently Windows rules the desktop world, even for diehard Unix > shops. But > that will not last forever. We need to start thinking about the desktop > today. We need to stop the official discouragement of desktop FreeBSD. > I agree with you, David, that although FreeBSD is primarily a server OS right now the desktop should not be forgotten. > So how about a "www.serverfreebsd.com" and a "www.desktopfreebsd.com"? > You > get the best of both worlds that way. I would not make completely separate sites. Maybe IMHO make two separate big areas you can choose on the start page of the website but make one entry point so people immediately can see that FreeBSD can be used for both. Alternatively one could make links from the single freebsd.com (or whatever its name will be) to these two sites you propose. Stephan