Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 00:09:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: desktop@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263307] devel/glib20 Options Default not default options poudriere builds fail arch i386 maybe others Message-ID: <bug-263307-39348-6Hx2eGO5YL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-263307-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-263307-39348@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263307 --- Comment #3 from Adriaan de Groot <adridg@freebsd.org> --- I tell a lie: DOCS is **on** by default, if it exists at all: see https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/#makefile-opti= ons , in particular 5.13.1.3 . I may have explicitly switched DOCS **off** at s= ome point, locally. If you want ports without DOCS, you need to switch that off specifically for that port. GLib docs are, unfortunately, heavyweight to build, because they need the G= Dbus examples, and that needs tests, .. and so you have a fair bit of build-dependency. Not runtime! See https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/-/issues/2430 for some discussion upstr= eam about that. Anyway, it seems the issue isn't really "the port options don't match my expectations", but "the DOCS build fails." The title of this PR doesn't sug= gest that to me, but now that I looked at the log .. this matches the build fail= ures other people have reported. Please try git main again: I landed a glib-2.70.4_5,2 today with a hope-it-fixes-it patch (I can't reproduce the problem locally, which is a bit of a problem). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263307-39348-6Hx2eGO5YL>