From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 9 22:51:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDC716A4CE for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 22:51:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A0C43FCB for ; Sun, 9 Nov 2003 22:51:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 252B43579D; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:51:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:51:52 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Message-Id: <20031110075152.5b06fe12.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <4C364FED-133F-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net> References: <61B97A72-128F-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net> <20031109112856.GB94834@xor.obsecurity.org> <6BE82884-1328-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net> <20031109210901.Y31688@seekingfire.com> <20031109222121.A31688@seekingfire.com> <32F637C6-133A-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net> <4C364FED-133F-11D8-9FD6-003065A70D30@shire.net> Organization: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS v2? possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 06:51:52 -0000 On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 22:32:38 -0700 "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" wrote: Hi, > It seems to be ok. I don't know what the problem is, but it seems to > be on the Linux end as I run mountd and portmap with verbose > debugging, as appropriate to each, and mountd immediately returns a > "mount successful" but Liunx take 10 minutes to return from the mount > command. You probably want to use the 'nolock' option in Linux, that solved it from me. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org