From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 29 10:20:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id KAA27036 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA27030; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA22554; Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) To: "Brian N. Handy" cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, Jordan Hubbard Subject: Re: Confused over new rc.* changes In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 1997 09:27:43 PDT." Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 10:20:34 -0700 Message-ID: <22552.862334434@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In /usr/src/etc there's now an etc.i386 directory which contains rc.i386. > I've poked through the remaining rc files and I can't see where this gets > called from. Is this file supposed to live in /etc/ or /etc/etc.i386? Is It's called from /etc/rc: # configure implementation specific stuff arch=`uname -m` if [ -f /etc/rc.${arch} ]; then . /etc/rc.${arch} fi > I like the new rc.conf setup, although it's not radically different from > sysconfig it's a lot simpler to look through for stuff. I'm just having a That was the basic idea - nothing too radical, just evolutionary. :) Jordan