From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 17:27:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B66016A4D6 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D915613C465 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52B25190F for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 13:27:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:27:10 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070625182710.0a506fdc@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20070625181426.3d55f801@3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk> References: <20070625120019.668D416A49A@hub.freebsd.org> <20070625151858.20ee23ad@3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk> <467FF5AC.3020902@otenet.gr> <20070625181426.3d55f801@3bsd.cpcnw.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.13; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Starting again from Scratch X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:27:21 -0000 On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:14:26 +0100 Graham Bentley wrote: > Thanks for the reply Manolis. As I mentioned in my first post, this > isnt for an important server, its just for 'desktop' use, for my own > amusement, a learning platform. I dont actually need the 'latest and > greatest' bleeding edge code, more so a reliable system for everyday > work, that I dont really want to spend too long tinkering but more > time using. In that case, don't upgrade your ports tree. By and large things are more likely to work when everything is built from the same tree, and the precompiled packages were built against the tree on the disk.