From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Feb 4 14:54:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8569CCE5CD for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C822A907 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v14EsuKV046387 for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:54:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 216780] Update Port: lang/sbcl Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 14:54:56 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 14:54:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216780 --- Comment #5 from John Marino --- Fine by me. If you still insist on your approach after breaking several po= rts and an entire platform (which signifies zero quality assurance was done on downstream ports) then it's best that the port returns to how it was before. The word "legacy" is wrong too. Right now the older bootstraps are sufficient. If they get too old, it's a simple matter of repackaging the latest SBCL fr= om FreeBSD 10.3. This is the most correct method of building a compiler.=20 You never gave your reasons for the change. I have to assume you just thou= ght it was easier to maintain that way. Maintainership is hard sometimes. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=