From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 16 09:17:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA19475 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 09:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA19468 for ; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 09:17:54 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.7.2/8.7.2) id SAA22535; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 18:00:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from knobel.gun.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by knobel.gun.de (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA01081; Sat, 16 Mar 1996 17:39:31 +0100 (MET) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 17:39:31 +0100 (MET) From: Andreas Klemm To: Peter Wemm cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Commit messages In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On 15 Mar 1996, Peter Wemm wrote: > Well, if there was enough demand for it, I guess I could whip something > up to do it... (It wouldn't be too hard, just a few lines of perl) > > Note that I personally dislike the idea, but I'm happy to go along with > what people want. > IMHO, if we do this, then we're going to have problems > with people that are running -stable not knowing what's in the pipeline in > -current, and we'll start to see wheels being reinvented... You're right, people who want to get the source repository for -stable should also receive -current to prevent this. The ones who want only the newest stable source have already the possibility to sup -stable. -- andreas@knobel.gun.de /\/\___ Wiechers & Partner Datentechnik GmbH Andreas Klemm ___/\/\/ $$ Support Unix - aklemm@wup.de $$ pgp p-key http://www-swiss.ai.mit.edu/~bal/pks-toplev.html >>> powered by <<< ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/Printing/aps-491.tgz >>> FreeBSD <<< "Ich bleibe bei der Aussage und trotze den Flames. :-)" Ulli Horlacher 02/96