From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 22 21:37:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A3616A4CF for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:37:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from avgw.bjut.edu.cn (avgw.bjut.edu.cn [202.112.78.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72DB643D41 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 21:37:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from liukang@bjpu.edu.cn) Received: from bjpu.edu.cn ([202.112.78.226]) by avgw.bjut.edu.cn (SAVSMTP 3.1.0.29) with SMTP id M2004032313370631677 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:37:06 +0800 Received: (eyou send program); Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:28:21 +0800 Message-ID: <280019701.22250@bjpu.edu.cn> X-EYOUMAIL-SMTPAUTH: liukang@bjpu.edu.cn Received: from unknown (HELO bjutliukang) (unknown@202.112.78.221) by 202.112.78.226 with SMTP; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:28:21 +0800 From: "Kang Liu" To: "'Olivier Vautrin'" , Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:36:55 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <279985788.02434@bjpu.edu.cn> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcQQSLHOSwz1cZ1bRJ62ObZlHQx/tQAT0aJA Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.0 and diablo-jdk-1.3.1 crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 05:37:07 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org] > On Behalf Of Olivier Vautrin > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:16 AM > To: Nate Williams > Cc: 'Nate Williams'; freebsd-java@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.0 and diablo-jdk-1.3.1 crash > > During this time, only the port 8180 (coyote) is listening: > That is ok. "HTTP_PORT?=8180" is set in Makefile to avoid conflict. > > Is that normal? Normally, the port 8080 should be listening also, no? > I tried also the JDK-1.3, but this one crashed during the port installation. > Have you tried other version of Jakarta-tomcat? Kang.