From owner-soc-status@freebsd.org Mon Jul 20 13:43:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: soc-status@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02F9A6FEA for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.hungerhost.com (smtp.hungerhost.com [216.38.53.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F1127A4 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@freebsd.org) Received: from cpe-24-193-227-129.nyc.res.rr.com ([24.193.227.129]:57395 helo=[192.168.73.208]) by vps.hungerhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHBLo-0006XF-9G; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:43:24 -0400 From: "George Neville-Neil" To: "Daniel Peyrolon" Cc: soc-status@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports for "JIT for firewalling" Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 09:43:12 -0400 Message-ID: <358A0094-61DE-4685-933F-EDED85A6A07C@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vps.hungerhost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - freebsd.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vps.hungerhost.com: authenticated_id: gnn@neville-neil.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-BeenThere: soc-status@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Summer of Code Status Reports and Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:43:26 -0000 Seems like the next thing to do is build from source as David suggests. Best, George On 20 Jul 2015, at 4:47, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This has not been a productive week. I've been so far unable to get > the > compiler working, I contacted David Chinsall as I said, and I have > been > looking to make everything works. The initialization process of LLVM > is not > working as expected, which may be related to a bad install (we have > already > disarded that), a bad building process, or a bad LLVM initialization > process. Given the fact that the LLVM API has changed a lot since the > last > time, that may be possible. > > El sáb., 11 jul. 2015 a las 12:24, Daniel Peyrolon > () > escribió: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> This last pair of weeks I've written the code needed to compile >> almost all >> the rules, except those that modify control flow: call and skipto. >> For >> those ones I will have to write them by hand on LLVM IR. >> >> I also started working on the testing code. I'm using conductor to >> control the different hosts. I already have reserved a pair of hosts >> from >> the netperf cluster in order to get that running. >> >> So far I haven't been able to test anything because the compiler is >> not >> working yet, there has been a change in the API of LLVM since I last >> worked >> with it, I sent an email to my past mentor, David Chisnall asking for >> advice. >> -- >> Daniel >> > -- > Daniel