Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 11:12:51 -0800 From: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> To: Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com> Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, Alexandre Biancalana <biancalana@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD at Amazon EC2 status Message-ID: <4F035333.6080601@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1325612405.6073.2704.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> References: <CAGF-nS6RJ5bt2mXMvTovaKfwCoOLX6i4VA2VMaqYQ%2BnQ-mQrPw@mail.gmail.com> <1325612405.6073.2704.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/03/12 09:40, Sean Bruno wrote:=0D > On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 09:07 -0800, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:=0D >> What=C2=B4s is the current state of FreeBSD running on Amazon EC2 ? Is= =0D >> this stable ? Looking at Colin's status page=0D >> (http://www.daemonology.net/freebsd-on-ec2/) looks like there=C2=B4s no= =0D >> active development on that.=0D =0D I'll be publishing AMIs for 9.0-RELEASE for the 64-bit "defenestrated"=0D instances and cluster compute instances.=0D =0D Beyond that, I'm mostly waiting for improvements from Amazon.=0D =0D >> Does someone running production workload with FreeBSD on EC2 ?=0D =0D Yes.=0D =0D >> I'm interested in running network (dns and http with accept filter)=0D >> and memory/buffer cache intensive applications on m1.small, m1.large=0D >> and m2.xlarge instances.=0D >>=0D >> Any thoughts ?=0D =0D You can't run FreeBSD on m1.small, but it works just fine on m1.large and=0D m2.xlarge as long as you don't mind paying the "Windows tax".=0D =0D -- =0D Colin Percival=0D Security Officer, FreeBSD | freebsd.org | The power to serve=0D Founder / author, Tarsnap | tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly para= noid
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F035333.6080601>