From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 28 12:54:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BBB106568F for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93498FC15 for ; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.codelab.cz [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6AE19E019; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:54:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (r5bb235.net.upc.cz [86.49.61.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C1FB19E027; Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:54:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4AE83F10.3060707@quip.cz> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:54:40 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cz, cs, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Huth References: <20091028110214.GB13028@borusse.borussiapark> <20091028122418.GB15578@borusse.borussiapark> In-Reply-To: <20091028122418.GB15578@borusse.borussiapark> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Next stable version X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:54:46 -0000 Alex Huth wrote: > * Daniel Bond schrieb: > >>Hi, >> >>Personally, I often wait untill the X.1 or X.2 release before upgrading >>systems allready in production, unless I need a new feature, but I >>advise testing the BETA's and RC's prior to release, so you can report >>bugs/issues to be fixed prior to the RELEASE. >> > > We actual have 6.4 on our production server. I don't want to upgrade, because > i need a different layout. I need the feature to use several IP in a jail. > That's why i am waiting for 8.0. But i have the possibillity to build it on a > secondary testing system, which will be later the productive system. If you only need jails with several IPs, IPv6 or noIPs, you can go for 7-STABLE. The multi-IP was committed right after the 7.2-RELEASE and I an running it for half a year without any problems + cpuset ability. Miroslav Lachman