From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Jan 18 10:31:52 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E31A86CDC
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B124D1CFA
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u0IAVqMM096572
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 206358] [NEW PORT] mail/opensmtpd-extras: porting
 OpenSMTPD-extras (plugins)
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords
Message-ID: <bug-206358-13-xN0QrHnH4T@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206358-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-206358-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:31:52 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206358

Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |feature, needs-qa, patch

--- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> ---
@Andrey

1) Might all the FILTER_* options be better placed in a group, without the
FILTER_ prefix in their name.

2) Might OPTION_CONFIGURE_WITH be more suitable for options that set a
--with-foo CONFIGURE_ARG, so that the corresponding --without-foo is set wh=
en
the option is disabled?

3) The OPENSSL option overrides as port options are probably not suitable,
given the framework has existing methods to override what SSL library is us=
ed.
Otherwise every single port that supported SSL would have these options.

That aside, OPTION_VARS=3DARBITRARYVAR=3DVALUE should be used instead of .if
PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO blocks.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=