From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jun 19 23:37:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D95215CD696; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9603884F2; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x5JNbm2C020559; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd-rwg@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x5JNbmRi020558; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-rwg) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201906192337.x5JNbmRi020558@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) In-Reply-To: <31076.1560978052@segfault.tristatelogic.com> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) CC: FreeBSD Net , Mailinglists FreeBSD X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A9603884F2 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.59)[-0.594,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.96)[0.956,0]; IP_SCORE(0.04)[ip: (0.14), ipnet: 69.59.192.0/19(0.07), asn: 13868(0.05), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[dnsmgr.net]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: gndrsh.dnsmgr.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.89)[0.888,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13868, ipnet:69.59.192.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 23:37:51 -0000 > In message > Andreas Nilsson wrote: > > >> That is *not* what the Handbook says. Please read it. > >> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html > >> > >Ok, so the handbook is wrong. It's a bug in the documentation. > > ACK Probably should just eliminate the firewall_type="/path/to/rules" thing, as that can be done with firewall_script and that does the right thing here. > >As soon as set firewall_script instead of firewall_type your problems will > >be solved. Just try it. The man page for rc.conf will tell you the same > >thing. > > ACK. Thank you for setting me straight. Your not wrong either. There are bugs here. > Regards, > rfg -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org