From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 17:06:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16751106564A for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [91.209.218.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1C48FC14 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.242.19.18] (helo=[172.16.100.7]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1Q0cYl-0009Yo-Sl; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:29:55 +0300 Message-ID: <4D83887E.60606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:29:50 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Kratzer References: <4D8370AB.1070000@zhegan.in> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christian Kratzer , "Eugene M. Zheganin" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipv6, stateful config and non-default prefixlen X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:06:57 -0000 18.03.2011 18:27, Christian Kratzer wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > >> Hi. >> >> I'm trying to get a working freebsd workstation with an ipv6 network >> where addresses are received from DHCP. >> ATM my IPv6 setup copies the IPv4 layout with vlans and /24 masks, so >> I'm using /120 prefixes. >> Is that even possible ? >> As the Handbook lacks any information about such setup, I decided to >> ask for help here. > > why not just use /64 prefixes ? You have 16 bits in your /48 to each > ipv4 /24 network to an ipv6 /64 network. > > Don't fight the system. > As for me, I've got /64 network and I must split it for tunneling, etc. So I have more wide prefixlen for my home network. I spend a lot of time to get auto configuration work, but gave up and set static config on all my home computers. The system is really strong :) -- Sem.