From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 11 19:41:58 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id TAA00724 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:41:58 -0700 Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA00701 ; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:41:53 -0700 Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA14306; Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:37:19 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199510120237.TAA14306@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: Netscape 2.0beta1 - Port of HotJava to FreeBSD and NetBSD More Usefull? To: jehamby@lightside.com (Jake Hamby) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 1995 19:37:19 -0700 (MST) Cc: pete@RockyMountain.rahul.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, netbsd-ports@netbsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Jake Hamby" at Oct 11, 95 05:53:26 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 428 Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > I heard there was some fairly good progress being made on a Linux port. > Is this true? Because if the Linux people have a working version, then a > FreeBSD/NetBSD version would be almost trivial from there. Not so. According to Linus (and Alan Cox), Linux has kernel multithreading. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.