From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 27 01:52:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A127A16A4DD; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EF043D46; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7R1qngj076826; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) with ESMTP id k7R1qnVO076823; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:52:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from arr@watson.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:52:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" To: Steve Kargl In-Reply-To: <20060826230735.GA47659@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Message-ID: <20060826215237.K74994@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060826212120.GA66604@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060826223608.GA5436@hub.freebsd.org> <20060826185936.C60397@fledge.watson.org> <20060826230735.GA47659@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Alexander Kabaev , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GCC 3.4.6 update complete X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:52:50 -0000 On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Steve Kargl wrote: :On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 07:00:08PM -0400, Andrew R. Reiter wrote: :> :> On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Alexander Kabaev wrote: :> :> :All is clear. This update should be pretty uneventful and nothing should :> :break because of it. I am very interested in being notified of anything :> :that contradicts with an above statement. :> : :> :> Any specific benefits from the move minus just "the latest & greatest"? :> Jsut curious. :> : :http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/ : Thanks; good point :-) Cheers, -- arr@watson.org