Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:42:33 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Inner workings of turnstiles and sleepqueues Message-ID: <200710190842.34286.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20071019045654.GF5411@hoeg.nl> References: <20071016094118.GE5411@hoeg.nl> <200710170916.18788.jhb@freebsd.org> <20071019045654.GF5411@hoeg.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 19 October 2007 12:56:54 am Ed Schouten wrote: > * John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > The best option right now is to read the code. There are some comments in > > both the headers and implementation. > > Would it be useful to write manpages for these interfaces, or do we > assume that only godlike people can use them anyway? I am willing to > write manpages for them. They already exist, but they really are only used to implement higher-level primitives like locks and condition variables. The rest of the kernel should use the higher-level primitives anyway. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200710190842.34286.jhb>