From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 31 19:29:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ADA16A41F for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9414543D45 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1EAYEs-000G5k-TT; Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:27:14 +0400 To: "Ezequiel O. Block" References: <4315F3CC.8030206@eobsistemas.com.ar> <65707696@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 23:27:14 +0400 In-Reply-To: <43160092.1050403@eobsistemas.com.ar> (Ezequiel O. Block's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300") Message-ID: <72895789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multihomed gateway X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 19:29:01 -0000 On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:10:10 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:15:40 -0300 Ezequiel O. Block wrote: > > > >>I'm currently running mpd as a PPPoe server, serving 250~ users with > >>no problems so far, what I need now is to add another ip pool range > >>from another provider, which means I need to handle two default > >>gateways, one for each C class network. but it seems that FreeBSD > >>cann't have two defaultrouter="" directives in rc.conf ... i have > >>googled about it and couldn't find any solution .. anyone here have > >>had this issue before? any clue? > > Maybe ipfw fwd action should fit your needs. > mmm I forgot to tell that each client pc gets a public ip address, > such as 200.43.83.x and the server does proxy arp on them, do you > think ipfw would be useful in this case? Proxyarp is acting at receiving packets from internet while forwarding takes place at sending packets. Seems that proxyarp is not an issue here. WBR -- bsam