From owner-freebsd-doc Sat Oct 13 13:39:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from aragorn.neomedia.it (aragorn.neomedia.it [195.103.207.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4319F37B40D for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 13:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from httpd@localhost) by aragorn.neomedia.it (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f9DKd6900091 for freebsd-doc@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:39:06 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Minor terminology problem Message-ID: <1003005546.3bc8a66a7e844@webmail.neomedia.it> Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:39:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Salvo Bartolotta MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4-cvs X-WebMail-Company: Neomedia s.a.s. X-Originating-IP: 62.98.238.27 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Houston^W (natively) English-speaking FreeBSD doc'ers, May I ask which of the following is [more] appropriate? a) "(in order) to store identification information on(=concerning) your sources" b) "(in order) to store identifying information on(=concerning) your sources. Should I prefer "about" to "on" in this specific instance (if it matters at all)? The fact is, both of these forms seem to be documented, or rather they are found on the 'Net; yet I am not sure which is (or should be) preferred. The doubt arose *after* a document of mine was committed (er, better late...:-)). TIA, Salvo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message