From owner-freebsd-chat  Fri Jul 19 17:55:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA00300
          for chat-outgoing; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA00278;
          Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA04779; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:53:46 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199607200053.RAA04779@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: "Marty Leisner" <leisner@sdsp.mc.xerox.com>
cc: "Craig Shaver" <craig@ProGroup.COM>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org,
        current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Opinions? NT VS UNIX, NT SUCKS SOMETIMES 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:27:41 PDT."
             <9607200027.AA14374@gemini.sdsp.mc.xerox.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:53:45 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of "Marty Leisner" :
> I really get miffed hearing people laud the robustness of NT and OS/2...I fou
nd
> both pale to current copies of linux and FreeBSD.
> 

Well, it depends on  your point of view. Yes Linux and FreeBSD are probably
more robust than NT or OS/2 however from a DOS and Win3.1 point of view
NT is rock solid 8)


	Regards,
	Amancio