Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2001 04:19:25 +0900
From:      Shoichi Sakane <sakane@ydc.co.jp>
To:        gunther@aurora.regenstrief.org
Cc:        snap-users@kame.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: (KAME-snap 4519) Re: KAME SPD bug, please try and confirm ...
Message-ID:  <20010424041925C.sakane@ydc.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2001 04:05:39 %2B0900" <20010424040539N.sakane@ydc.co.jp>
References:  <20010424040539N.sakane@ydc.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > sorry that we did not make any useful responses, some of the kame guys
> > > (mainly sakane) are trying to repeat the symptom.
> > I appreciate that very much!
> 
> I have tested, but I couldn't have any error.  I made the following network.
> And I executed flooding ping to A from both B and C.  All of hosts seemed
> quite stable.  Of course, these ICMP packet were encapsulated by ESP.
> 
> Actually, I couldn't prepare three FreeBSD machine.
> A and C are FreeBSD4.2-RELEASE, and B is NetBSD1.5.
> All of them are *WITHOUT* KAME patch.
> 
> 	A ---+--- B
> 	     |
> 	     +--- C
> 
> Host A is powerless machine which is pentium 100MHz.
> just in case, I attach these configuration and results into this mail.
> These are:
> 
> 	net-A:  first configuration on the host A.
> 	net-A2: configuration on the host A after host C added.
> 	net-B:  configuration on the host B.
> 	net-C:  configuration on the host C.

Note that I was guided by your description in
http://orange.kame.net/dev/query-pr.cgi?pr=346

> 	host-A: results of ifconfig, netstat on the host A.
> 	host-B: results of ifconfig, netstat on the host B.
> 	host-C: results of ifconfig, netstat on the host C.

> > >  i ran a small test with slightly different setup on both NetBSD
> > >  1.5.1_BETA and NetBSD 1.5 + KAME SNAP 2001042x, and the problem did
> > >  not repeat.
> > Hmm, may be it's a matter of FreeBSD and does not occur with NetBSD?
> 
> > >  is the following description correct?
> > >  - FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE is not affected
> > yes, it is affected with kernel panic (under high loads only ...)
> 
> How was "high loads" ?  I did flooding ping invoked "-f -s 1000"
> from both B and C.  But kernel panic didn't happened.
> 
> I haven't checked the following case.  But I think the issue exists in
> a other place.
> 
> > > - FreeBDS 4.2-RELEASE + KAME SNAP 200103xx has problem, but no kernel
> > >   panic
> > right, shows the described problems but has no such kernel panics
> 
> > > - FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE + KAME SNAP 200104xx has problem, with kernel
> > > panic
> > actually I should test that. Will do tomorrow.
> 
> /Shoichi Sakane @ KAME project/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010424041925C.sakane>