From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 14 03:00:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 23BC6106566B; Sun, 14 Aug 2011 03:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 03:00:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Dmitry Marakasov Message-ID: <20110814030033.GA80255@FreeBSD.org> References: <201108020942.p729g1Ti068765@repoman.freebsd.org> <20110811180338.GB88978@hades.panopticon> <20110812093328.GE85247@hades.panopticon> <20110812101133.GF85247@hades.panopticon> <4E4584EA.7090306@FreeBSD.org> <20110813133717.GA38385@hades.panopticon> <4E469837.1030903@FreeBSD.org> <20110813172040.GC38385@hades.panopticon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110813172040.GC38385@hades.panopticon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , Doug Barton , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Matthias Andree Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/cad/admesh Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 03:00:34 -0000 On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:20:40PM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Matthias Andree (mandree@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > Possibly we should always mark ports for removal for three months after > > the point in time when the maintainer gets reset to ports@. > > Nice. Well that'll only result in two processes: more and more ports > will have maintainers reset and then removed, and remaining maintainers > will take more and more ports beyond their ability to maintain them, > both will lead to collapse. Is this also not undesirable? Big +1 for Dmitry here; ports@ is perfectly fine maintainer entity, much easier to work with, and often receives more and better care than many of seemingly "properly" maintained ports. ./danfe