From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 05:58:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C60106564A; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from cell.p6m7g8.net (static-71-178-236-107.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.236.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3348FC0A; Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (pool-173-66-138-144.washdc.fios.verizon.net [173.66.138.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by cell.p6m7g8.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9L5wOik030599 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:58:24 GMT (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Message-ID: <4CBFD67A.3070607@p6m7g8.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 01:58:18 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6M7G8 Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101013 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu References: <20101020043329.CB2D85A9051@jester1b.ixsystems.com> <4CBE771C.3050909@p6m7g8.com> <20101020101628.38fc14f3@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20101020101628.38fc14f3@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, FH_HOST_EQ_VERIZON_P, RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on cell.p6m7g8.net Cc: QAT@freebsd.org, apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/apache20 - fails: configure_error X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 05:58:28 -0000 On 10/20/2010 3:16 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Well, it's OK now, but this looks more like something wrong in the code > that tindy. make jobs unsafe maybe? I'd be willing to bet the 2.0.64 update fixes this; of course we won't really know until we build it a few thousand times. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.