From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 8 17:20:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8820A16A407; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F09F43D49; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (ceri@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k98HKkC4058988; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:20:46 GMT (envelope-from ceri@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from ceri@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k98HKkQx058984; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:20:46 GMT (envelope-from ceri) Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 17:20:46 GMT From: Ceri Davies Message-Id: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org> To: maho@FreeBSD.org, ceri@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:20:46 -0000 Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: ceri State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 State-Changed-Why: ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer. This is an interesting test case though. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs Responsible-Changed-By: ceri Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006 Responsible-Changed-Why: Scheduler problem. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85820