From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jun 17 19:50:55 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9953332B7 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49nFzy3mbKz4P4j for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:To:In-Reply-To:Cc:References:Message-Id:Date: Mime-Version:From:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=XYGaXlm12+4ii9c5RLzzgD7Rj4d0B5CElRtXy0BlLfg=; b=HB9odDl3Xs/xe664PKt6MisDfB 5JZ4nQ8WfSvin5EOreU7ooOSd4jsBeG9dRu5ivp4nIexQoiXf1XlQY+w653pAbxokx7YpoUKzds7e 3IFsDauvxHZ/kEQllKOYkgtoZwhlXzN+LvD3mSnhfqPqfWTpF9/dh9baPdLolZcZxfAo=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jle55-0002Yn-12; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:43 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jle53-0008LR-Lu; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:42 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F2A12802BB; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:41 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id G-M1Tw0ADLxe; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [IPv6:2607:fb90:f710:67:bd62:4da9:8a75:1be0] (unknown [172.58.79.206]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 951C2128040E; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Rebecca Cran Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 13:50:04 -0600 Message-Id: <890A1C97-31A1-46F9-BE9B-340F6039DD45@bsdio.com> References: Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Miguel C , FreeBSD Current In-Reply-To: To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17F80) X-XM-SPF: eid=1jle53-0008LR-Lu; ; ; mid=<890A1C97-31A1-46F9-BE9B-340F6039DD45@bsdio.com>; ; ; hst=in01.mta.xmission.com; ; ; ip=166.70.13.69; ; ; frm=rebecca@bsdio.com; ; ; spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE, T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,XM_B_Unicode autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4998] * 0.0 XM_B_Unicode BODY: Testing for specific types of unicode * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 * chars * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: ; sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Warner Losh X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 986 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 15 (1.5%), b_tie_ro: 13 (1.3%), parse: 1.18 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 20 (2.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.45 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.5 (0.5%), tests_pri_-950: 1.39 (0.1%), tests_pri_-900: 1.15 (0.1%), tests_pri_-90: 82 (8.3%), check_bayes: 80 (8.1%), b_tokenize: 6 (0.6%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 1.92 (0.2%), b_tok_touch_all: 61 (6.2%), b_finish: 1.33 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 847 (85.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.85 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 627 (63.6%), poll_dns_idle: 610 (61.8%), tests_pri_10: 3.7 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 9 (0.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: CTF: UEFI HTTP boot support X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49nFzy3mbKz4P4j X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=HB9odDl3; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com designates 166.70.13.233 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.23 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:166.70.13.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.961]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[172.58.79.206:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.15)[-1.150]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.02)[-1.018]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gndrsh.dnsmgr.net,gmail.com,freebsd.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.233:from] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.33 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 19:50:55 -0000 > On Jun 17, 2020, at 12:12 PM, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > I missed the start of this thread, so maybe I'm missing a key detail. Howe= ver, I thought UEFI didn't have a RAM-disk, per se, but that we could load m= emory areas and pass that into the kernel using freebsd-only methods. But UE= FI is a bit weird, so maybe it will generate a virtual cdrom... See https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/FINAL%20Pres4%20UEFI%20HT= TP%20Boot.pdf =E2=80=9C RAM Disk Standard =E2=80=A2 UEFI 2.5 defined RAM Disk device path nodes - Standard access to a RAM Disk in UEFI - Supports Virtual Disk and Virtual CD (ISO image) in persistent or volatile memory=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94=20 Rebecca Cran=