From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 14:35:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC5B1065675; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ACA8FC19; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:35:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA26010; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:35:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Message-ID: <4C9B65BC.4010305@icyb.net.ua> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:35:40 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100920 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Daniel O'Connor" References: <4C9B0F2C.20601@FreeBSD.org> <4C9B406D.3000201@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Motin , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: SuperMicro i7 (UP) - very slow performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:35:55 -0000 on 23/09/2010 15:37 Daniel O'Connor said the following: > > On 23/09/2010, at 21:26, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 23/09/2010 11:26 Alexander Motin said the following: >>> PS: AFAIK dev.cpu.0.freq won't report you if frequency was lowered due >>> to overheating. >> >> I think that you are correct about this. >> And last I checked we simply ignored thermal throttling interrupt. > > I could not get cpufreq to show a lower frequency when I tried overheating a CPU even though the performance dropped. > > It would be really nice if there was some notification of CPU throttling :) cpufreq is not designed to monitor what is going on in cpu. cpufreq knows what cpu supports and knows host to set a certain frequency (performance level rather). -- Andriy Gapon