From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Mar 18 19:45:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02535
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02530
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA19448; Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:45:25 -0800 (PST)
To: tenser@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu
cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: X11 under 2.2-RELEASE? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "19 Mar 1997 03:04:37 GMT."
             <19970319030437.29294.qmail@spitfire.ecsel.psu.edu> 
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:45:25 -0800
Message-ID: <19445.858743125@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Hmm, is it just me, or are the versions of xterm and xdm shipped with
> 2.2-RELEASE still slightly skewed with respect to utmp?

When did you last check?  Rich *just* updated them yesterday.

					Jordan