From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Mar 11 19:25:54 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from linux.ssc.nsu.ru (linux.ssc.nsu.ru [193.124.219.91])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B20437B718
	for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 19:25:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru)
Received: (qmail 2743 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2001 03:25:25 -0000
Received: from inet.ssc.nsu.ru (62.76.110.12)
  by hub.freebsd.org with SMTP; 12 Mar 2001 03:25:25 -0000
Received: from localhost (danfe@localhost)
	by inet.ssc.nsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA24105;
	Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:24:22 +0600
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:24:22 +0600 (NOVT)
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
Cc: thierry@herbelot.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Porting NVidia linux kernel modules to FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120826030.23985-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10103120921460.24090-100000@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:

> > 
> > > But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2,
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> 
> Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?!
> 

Or, even better, 4.0.2 + "suppose-we-managed-to-port-it nvidia kernel
module" + nvidia binary 'nvidia' replacement module for XFree-4's 'nv'
driver?  I mean, will 336/utah be better??

  //danfe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message