Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 11:53:17 +0200 From: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> To: Nuno Teixeira <eduardo@freebsd.org> Cc: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@freebsd.org>, <ports-committers@freebsd.org>, <dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org>, <dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: git: b56d0bc41af7 - main - devel/libcutl: Explain why USE_CXXSTD=c++11 is used Message-ID: <45470f65-48c3-9a18-b7bd-26ce17160afd@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <CAFDf7ULoQfRo4S45Fpwm9Ve4h0E%2Bd82z5SYrFopmcKFLOShrdw@mail.gmail.com> References: <202307050850.3658oPOA049562@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CAFDf7UJRc4bd3XVq%2Bb7Za2cLN7h_hkN1mpPTGQiSajV1p9A=0g@mail.gmail.com> <ebcdf01a-2b73-39c3-b6e4-25659e53b1ca@gwdg.de> <e56d377d0985b86be2291b64bb3c686742283dde.camel@FreeBSD.org> <6cf6a5eb00dfac8358dfcb1e1d5b69f293c3e85a.camel@FreeBSD.org> <4701f862-7a0b-afab-48fd-a62b6f5ec308@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7UKJh%2BscZ-zkmwWUNeQbVB%2B42TQSN8-m102iChi8wg0WoA@mail.gmail.com> <4cc5665f-a4ef-a4ef-226a-a9a59b29f3a0@gwdg.de> <CAFDf7ULoQfRo4S45Fpwm9Ve4h0E%2Bd82z5SYrFopmcKFLOShrdw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 07.07.23 um 10:59 schrieb Nuno Teixeira: > Hello! > > I've bumped PORTREVISION to 10 so we can identify better each experiment > build: > > PORTREVISION=10: USE_CXXSTD=c++14 > build status: > http://freebsdrpi4.hopto.org/build.html?mastername=13Saarch64-main&build=2023-07-07_09h44m48s <http://freebsdrpi4.hopto.org/build.html?mastername=13Saarch64-main&build=2023-07-07_09h44m48s>; > > and when built I will do a run test. > Oops, yes! > Shoud I test gnu++14 too? I accidentally provided a patch with c++14 that I had used for another test of my own. Meant was gnu++14, so please feel free to test that one too. Thanks! > > > > > Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de <mailto:rhurlin@gwdg.de>> escreveu no > dia sexta, 7/07/2023 à(s) 06:42: > > Hi Nuno, > > Am 06.07.23 um 23:51 schrieb Nuno Teixeira: > > Hello Rainer, > > > > Still, one more question: is it safe to remove > USES=compiler:c++11-lang > > for architectures other than amd64 and i386 and just use > > USE_STDCXX=gnu++14. I have no way to test for arm, etc. > > > > > > I've asked the same for compiler:c11 on mailing today. > > My doubt is: is it neccessary using c11, c++11, etc when available > > compilers support it or have capabilities for it? > > > > I can do poudriere testport and run test on a rpi4 running 13 > stable, > > just send me diff. > > Thanks for the offer. Here is a diff against games/eboard with the to > changes: > > diff --git a/games/eboard/Makefile b/games/eboard/Makefile > index 3f78f9e91874..ce399415cba8 100644 > --- a/games/eboard/Makefile > +++ b/games/eboard/Makefile > @@ -20,10 +20,10 @@ LIB_DEPENDS= > libfontconfig.so:x11-fonts/fontconfig \ > libfreetype.so:print/freetype2 \ > libpng.so:graphics/png > > -USES= compiler:c++11-lang gnome gstreamer perl5 pkgconfig > shebangfix tar:bzip2 > +USES= gnome gstreamer perl5 pkgconfig shebangfix tar:bzip2 > # eboard 1.1.13 is not compatible with C++17, which is the > default since > # clang 16. This means ports depending on it also need to use at > most > C++14. > -USE_CXXSTD= c++11 > +USE_CXXSTD= c++14 > USE_GITHUB= yes > GH_ACCOUNT= fbergo > USE_GNOME= cairo gdkpixbuf2 gtk20 > > > It would be very nice if you could also look for arm, if the package is > still binary compatible compared to the unpatched version :) > > Thanks a lot ! > > Best wishes, > Rainer > > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Nuno Teixeira > > FreeBSD Committer (ports) > > > > -- > Nuno Teixeira > FreeBSD Committer (ports)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45470f65-48c3-9a18-b7bd-26ce17160afd>