From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jun 21 11:48:43 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.osd.bsdi.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3338B37C012
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:48:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.osd.bsdi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12216;
	Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Robert Withrow <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>
Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>,
	Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>,
	Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>,
	current@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 21 Jun 2000 09:49:27 EDT."
             <200006211349.JAA02411@pobox.engeast.BayNetworks.COM> 
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:45:48 -0700
Message-ID: <12213.961613148@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who
recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything.
Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to
change. :)

- Jordan


> 
> phk@critter.freebsd.dk said:
> :- "CVS branches suck" is the reason I belive. 
> 
> Bitkeeper?
> 
> -- 
> Robert Withrow -- (+1 978 288 8256)
> BWithrow@BayNetworks.com
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message