Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:29:42 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, phk@dk.tfs.com, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WHY? ...non-use of TAILQ macros...
Message-ID:  <199704112229.PAA12512@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <19057.860797750@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Apr 11, 97 03:29:10 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I don't have another 10M for another checked out tree, unless I want
> 
> Buy a disk! ;-)

Or you could just integrate the patches and I could quit carrying them
around.

It would save me the cost of another disk and a hell of a lot of wasted
integration time, and it would save you the email I send about it... and
free me up to work on other things, like queue macro patches.

Sounds like a win-win situation.


					Regards,
					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704112229.PAA12512>