Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Feb 95 16:39:10 MST
From:      terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
To:        davidg@Root.COM
Cc:        jmb@kryten.atinc.com, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: MIT SHM X11 extensions? (fwd)
Message-ID:  <9502062339.AA07346@cs.weber.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199502062301.PAA00617@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Feb 6, 95 03:01:27 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Further, Terry's assertion that the
> binary's vnode has the VTEXT flag turned on (and thus prevents you from
> overwriting it [ETXTBUSY]) is also WRONG. It does NOT do this, and as such it
> is perfectly okay to clobber your binary.

Oh ick.

Uh, why is ETXTBUSY still around?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9502062339.AA07346>