Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 00:37:24 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: make concurrency kit a module Message-ID: <CANCZdfrMAjgtvoDVDDJn%2BGGNQ7Xnb7oDsqFHZB_Vx%2BR3KU6Hog@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170518055352.bflapm6mmfhgl4y4@ivaldir.net> References: <CAJ-VmomQ_=h7YVmPZLbD8wmu6OQjW%2BQRDHYjqdzfUr0O0AsAqA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=9BMSUG9wBsAY4siN2BW7oZPj=hObay7WStwW2MXgC0w@mail.gmail.com> <20170518055352.bflapm6mmfhgl4y4@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:53 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 06:04:09PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D10778 >> > > Except there are plans to use it elsewhere. Many areas may be improved using it. > > Having it as a module would mean some devs might refrain from using it because > there is no waranty for it to be there > > Areas like VFS and network stack could have a good benefice from using it. > > Out of curiousity what size is saved? I'd planned on using it newbus to solve the lifetime issues we have with device_t's.... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfrMAjgtvoDVDDJn%2BGGNQ7Xnb7oDsqFHZB_Vx%2BR3KU6Hog>