From owner-freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 4 20:05:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D80D1065677; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102428FC29; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 20:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 63.imp.bsdimp.com (63.imp.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q24K0hmW010484 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:00:43 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 13:00:43 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201202181720.27135.hselasky@c2i.net> <20120303124805.GA4725@thorin> <201203031902.11035.hselasky@c2i.net> To: Robert Millan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:00:44 -0700 (MST) Cc: Kostik Belousov , Adrian Chadd , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Exclude USB drivers from main kernel image? X-BeenThere: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD support for USB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 20:05:47 -0000 On Mar 4, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Robert Millan wrote: > El 3 de mar=E7 de 2012 19:37, Warner Losh ha escrit: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> Your patch looks good. >>>=20 >>> Are there any objections committing the patch attached to the = previous e-mail? >>=20 >> Do all the platforms that had the devices removed work? Have they = all been tested? >=20 > I've tested the i386 flavour on a FreeBSD VM. It boots and > successfully loads ums.ko. >=20 > Aside from that, a very similar setup has been tested for i386 and > amd64 on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, for several months. >=20 > I'm unable to test the other architectures. But if you're more > comfortable that way, I have no problem with excluding them from my > patch. It is the other architectures that I'm specifically worried about. I = know that x86 flavors will work even without testing them specifically = since I've been doing something akin to this for years. I've not had = good luck always with arm and mips platforms and USB, so I'd feel better = if we could get some testing done there. I'll see what I can dig up = from my board pile to test, but my coverage will be limited. Read this as a "go ahead with x86, please wait on the others for more = data" from me. Warner