From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Jul 5 10:13:15 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06901103D8F7 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from constantine.ingresso.co.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a02:b90:3002:411::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54FA373997; Thu, 5 Jul 2018 10:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petefrench@ingresso.co.uk) Received: from [2a02:b90:3002:411::6] (helo=dilbert.ingresso.co.uk) by constantine.ingresso.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1fb1GA-000PmI-8i; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:13:10 +0000 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.ingresso.co.uk with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1fb1GA-0000s2-Cy; Thu, 05 Jul 2018 11:13:10 +0100 To: kostikbel@gmail.com, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk Subject: Re: Ryzen issues on FreeBSD ? (with sort of workaround) Cc: avg@freebsd.org, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@hda3.com, truckman@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <343bb693-850b-92b0-9749-5c722b90f817@ingresso.co.uk> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 11:13:10 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 10:13:15 -0000 So, I got my first lockup in weeks, testing with the latest stable and the patch which sets the kernel bits. But I cant say it its Ryzen related or not. Meanwhile I also got access to an Epyc server in Azure. Am also runing the latest STABLE on that tp see how it goes. Interesting thing there is that there appears to be no access to the MSR's. They all appear as zerousing cpucontrol. I am not entirely surprised by this as the are very low level, but I di think they were saved and restored during context switches between virtual machines so I was hoping to be able to set them. Is this normal ? -pete.