From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Mar 1 12:44:41 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id MAA16097 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 12:44:41 -0800 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA16090 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 12:44:33 -0800 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id MAA23258; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 12:44:23 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id MAA00337; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 12:44:23 -0800 Message-Id: <199503012044.MAA00337@corbin.Root.COM> X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij) cc: FreeBSD-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD-hackers) Subject: Re: telnetd linemode still broken??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Mar 95 20:54:40 +0100." <199503011954.UAA09646@gvr.win.tue.nl> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 01 Mar 1995 12:44:21 -0800 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >It seems (from personal experience) that the telnetd LINEMODE option >still is broken. Shall I just remove the option from the Makefile? >It really is annoying :-( No, someone needs to fix it. There appears to be a form of race condition that causes the options to be strangly interpreted. I think it has to do with how the options are packetized - the receiver of them doesn't coalesce them correctly when they span multiple read calls. This is of course just a guess- if I knew what was causing it, I'd have committed a fix. :-) -DG