Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:22:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: bug in awk implementation? Message-ID: <200207170122.g6H1MPHh093173@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207161657060.27685-100000@smtp.gnf.org> References: <20020716214355.GE20381@blossom.cjclark.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207161657060.27685-100000@smtp.gnf.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Since you insisted on CC'ing me...] <<On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:57:42 -0700 (PDT), Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org> said: > No, you are quoting from the gawk(1) man page. The awk(1) man page makes > no such statement. The awk(1) manual page does not define the correct behavior of gawk(1). IEEE Std. 1003.1-2001 defines the correct behavior of both awk(1) and gawk(1), and as I have already demonstrated, it leaves the behavior in question clearly unspecified. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207170122.g6H1MPHh093173>