From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 31 17:18:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id 7875116A406; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:18:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: perforce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5132A16A400 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:18:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14FB713C478 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0VHIrH2026114; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:18:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Divacky Roman Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:18:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200701310016.l0V0GccJ095661@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070131085906.GA28186@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20070131085906.GA28186@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701311218.51103.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2508/Wed Jan 31 11:42:50 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 113739 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:18:54 -0000 On Wednesday 31 January 2007 03:59 am, Divacky Roman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 12:16:38AM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=113739 > > > > Change 113739 by jkim@jkim_hammer on 2007/01/31 00:15:36 > > > > Do not reload %gs from linux_*sigcode(). > > This seem to fix TLS on amd64, finally. :-) > > > > Tested on UP and QEMU. Need more testing on SMP. > > > > Affected files ... > > > > .. > > //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_locore > >.s#2 edit > > > > Differences ... > > > > ==== > > //depot/projects/linuxolator/src/sys/amd64/linux32/linux32_locore > >.s#2 (text+ko) ==== > > > > @@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ > > NON_GPROF_ENTRY(linux_sigcode) > > call *LINUX_SIGF_HANDLER(%esp) > > leal LINUX_SIGF_SC(%esp),%ebx /* linux scp */ > > +#if 0 > > movl LINUX_SC_GS(%ebx),%gs > > +#endif > > movl LINUX_SC_FS(%ebx),%fs > > movl LINUX_SC_ES(%ebx),%es > > movl LINUX_SC_DS(%ebx),%ds > > @@ -25,7 +27,9 @@ > > linux_rt_sigcode: > > call *LINUX_RT_SIGF_HANDLER(%esp) > > leal LINUX_RT_SIGF_UC(%esp),%ebx /* linux ucp */ > > +#if 0 > > movl LINUX_SC_GS(%ebx),%gs > > +#endif > > great work! why didnt you just remove those lines but if 0 them? Because it's not done yet. I need more testing and clean-up before MFP4. I'd like to test it on SMP but I don't have one. :-( > without commit it looks a little strange to someone who doesnt know > why/where/how :) Indeed. Jung-uk Kim