From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sat May 18 13:18:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3297158ABD2; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7660381F2F; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 660F08C85; Sat, 18 May 2019 13:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 13:18:04 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jason Bacon Cc: "Jason W. Bacon" , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r501873 - in head/biology: . gemma gemma/files Message-ID: <20190518131804.GA12903@FreeBSD.org> References: <201905171445.x4HEjKE4084764@repo.freebsd.org> <20190518102522.GA45838@FreeBSD.org> <205369ac-7666-0d45-7f76-a473915a0eb9@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <205369ac-7666-0d45-7f76-a473915a0eb9@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7660381F2F X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.972,0] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2019 13:18:05 -0000 On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 08:09:45AM -0500, Jason Bacon wrote: > Ultimately I chose to follow the pattern of lowercasing the port > directory (except for special cases like perl and cran) and matching > the case of PORTNAME with upstream Vast majority of upstream names use mixed case (most common is first capital letter), but we and GNU/Linux people don't do that: look at package names of Firefox, DeaDBeeF, PostgreSQL, etc. > (which in this instance eliminates the need for GH_PROJECT). Setting GH_PROJECT is perfectly normal in this case. > It's not consistent, though, which bugs me a little: [...] > > It would be nice if we either had a clear convention about PORTNAME > or the pkg command were universally agnostic about case. Or we could simply follow Unix predilection to lowercase and stop worrying about these issues. ./danfe