Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:58:27 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD-ia64@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: i386 binaris on ia64
Message-ID:  <20030717055827.GA96381@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030716173628.GA20444@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
References:  <20030715235027.GA16599@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <XFMail.20030716132942.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20030716173628.GA20444@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:36:28AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> I think it's better to make it a port. That way it's more easily
> shared with amd64 (if applicable).

AMD64 should be building the 32-bit libs as part of 'make world'.  I
would look for an i64 specific solution to the issue you mentioned of the
compat4x port only having those bits that had their shared version
bumped.
 
-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030717055827.GA96381>