From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 26 15:49:52 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE05106564A
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:49:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195FB8FC16
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:49:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <freebsd-net@m.gmane.org>) id 1RJ5jg-0005jh-5M
	for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:49:48 +0200
Received: from 208.85.208.53 ([208.85.208.53])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:49:48 +0200
Received: from atkin901 by 208.85.208.53 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:49:48 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: Mark Atkinson <atkin901@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:49:29 -0700
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <j89a6a$mgt$1@dough.gmane.org>
References: <B143A8975061C446AD5E29742C531723163943@PWSVL-EXCMBX-01.internal.cacheflow.com>
	<CAGnGRdLrRukxJk2Jfhs37uGfM6X+fAoqtoSwBe9rsXLiSM=hSA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.85.208.53
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
	rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111003 Thunderbird/7.0.1
In-Reply-To: <CAGnGRdLrRukxJk2Jfhs37uGfM6X+fAoqtoSwBe9rsXLiSM=hSA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9 IPv6 conformance test report
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:49:52 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/25/2011 14:22, Qing Li wrote:
> Since I have been receiving private reports on the test failures, I
> thought I just post the test report as executed against the
> upcoming FreeBSD 9.0 release in my own setup, so you can see where
> the baseline is.
> 
> More test reports will be posted here.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~qingli/ct-freebsd-9/
> 
> 
> I am going over each failure and providing the fix.
> 
> Please let me know if you already have a suggested patch that you
> are willing to share.

Are the ct-2.1.1 suite results still a good baseline?   From what I
understand the v6 ready logo phase 2 tests are what people are
comparing their compliance against currently.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6oLAkACgkQrDN5kXnx8ybkUACeIWdJfUHnMmLnipiJGN8eMqm8
MYEAnAuOIxwfi7ZeqYo40VHxN3b8NuNc
=0n4k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----