From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Sep 22 08:01:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F9BBE43EE for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F943D3B for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (62.211.162.64) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 57DB917201163B48; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:55:08 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u8M7t7wf079304; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:55:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: OpenGL over X11/SSH To: Polytropon References: <2deff892-7ac3-e3e2-92fe-27e95f089ea0@netfence.it> <20160922051741.5092ccae.freebsd@edvax.de> <15ee2107-8cdc-8d1a-4bb5-2765587453b0@netfence.it> <20160922093225.92c833cc.freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <36548c08-36a7-bd2c-05e7-e783838dd707@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:55:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160922093225.92c833cc.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 08:01:15 -0000 On 09/22/16 09:32, Polytropon wrote: >> An option in some port? > > Probably yes. I checked graphics/libGL, but it has no options. Any other hint? > Without xorg.conf, loading the DRM/DRI components is probably > the default by now. Ok, but xorg.conf should be an X-server config file. So I have no X-server where the client program runs. > Maybe. If my guess is right and "r600" is related to that Radeon > card (client-side), the program seems to try to attach to it. Do > you have DRM/DRI enabled on your client where the local display > is being used? Yes: the client machine happily works in DRM/DRI mode with a Radeon. I'd like to keep that, since local applications take advantage from it. I'm wondering: since the error also mentions swrast and swrast_dri.so, could I try to make it work this way? Where would I find them? > If I remember my "OpenGL adventures" (many years ago) correctly, > the _program_ needs to be able to request software rendering. This > can be done by deactivating the OpenGL hardware accelleration at > compile time, or by an option - it depends on the program. The "program" has no such options: it uses graphics/togl, however. There is no option in togl either :( bye & Thanks av.