From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 28 14:50:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B82106566B for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:50:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.kuriger@liquidphlux.com) Received: from mail.liquidphlux.com (mail.liquidphlux.com [209.98.210.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1231D8FC1D for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:50:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.liquidphlux.com (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8F5DA4EBFC5; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:33:43 -0500 (CDT) To: "Paul B. Mahol" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:33:43 -0500 From: Andrew Kuriger In-Reply-To: <3a142e750909280701s5276f6acy1d83a0a4476653fa@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090928120734.GA3669@current.Sisis.de> <3a142e750909280701s5276f6acy1d83a0a4476653fa@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <52dc872e27534cfb561ac611ba11b7df@mail.liquidphlux.com> X-Sender: a.kuriger@liquidphlux.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3-stable Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: WLAN performance Windows/XP ./. FreeBSD 8-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:50:51 -0000 On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:01:53 +0200, "Paul B. Mahol" wrote: > On 9/28/09, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I am wondering what could cause the following WLAN performance diff >> between a XP and 8-CURRENT laptop, sitting side by side and connected to >> the same AP: >> >> OS XP 8-CURRENT >> NIC Intel 3945ABG Atheros 5424/2424 >> Ping 6ms 116ms >> downstream 9.05Mbit/s 6.58Mbit/s >> upstream 6.58Mbit/s 4.55Mbit/s >> >> measured with http://www.speedtest.net/ against the same remote server >> at the same time... Any ideas? > > Emulated flash? I have also found that speedtest(s) aren't always that accurate at all either. If you really wanted to test the speed diffs you may want to attach a local file server, and check upload and download speeds against a local server instead of an unknown remote host for accurate results. ~Andrew