Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:31:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 206512] sysutils/coreutils: Update to 8.25
Message-ID:  <bug-206512-13-ZMPXd9DdX3@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-206512-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-206512-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206512

jharris@widomaker.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mcy@lm7.fr,
                   |                            |nivit@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #10 from jharris@widomaker.com ---
Actually, with a little more grepping, I see that only sysutils/renameutils
explicitly uses coreutils' gls, the only program identified in the mailing =
list
message you referenced.  Matteo has been added to this bug's CC list.

All other ports explicitly (grep|awk|sort|uniq -c) use just one coreutils
program:

   1 gcp
   2 ginstall
   2 gmd5sum
   1 gprintf
   3 greadlink
   1 grep
   1 gsha256sum
   1 gtail

except for graphics/variety, which I have grepped and can't determine where=
 it
actually uses any of the coreutils programs (no instances of gcp, gls, etc.)
So, nivit@ is also CC'd.

Matteo and nivit@, will the coreutils gls change described here:

  http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2016-02/msg00000.html

break your ports I just mentioned?  If you don't mind, please test against =
this
coreutils 8.25 patch:

  https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D166632&action=3Ddiff

Thanks.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-206512-13-ZMPXd9DdX3>