From owner-cvs-all Mon Aug 19 15:13:25 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D3D37B400; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from iguana.icir.org (iguana.icir.org [192.150.187.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1323C43E3B; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:13:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: from iguana.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by iguana.icir.org (8.12.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g7JMDHIb040814; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo@iguana.icir.org) Received: (from rizzo@localhost) by iguana.icir.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g7JMDHBA040813; Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:13:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rizzo) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 15:13:17 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo To: "David O'Brien" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw2.c src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw2.c Message-ID: <20020819151316.A40739@iguana.icir.org> References: <200208161031.g7GAVmQ7053775@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020819210330.GA4958@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020819210330.GA4958@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:03:30PM -0700 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David, there was only one commit that changed userland-kernel interaction, src/sys/netinet/ip_fw.h: Revision 1.74 Sat Aug 10 04:37:32 2002 UTC (9 days, 17 hours ago) by luigi (previous one on that file was 4 weeks old) The one you mention below only affects manipulation of sets of rules -- certainly the "unknown opcode" complaints that you were mentioning earlier relate to the change to ip_fw.h, not this one. In any case, i am done with ipfw2 except for a minor thing that will not impact userland-kernel interaction. cheers luigi On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:03:30PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 03:31:48AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > luigi 2002/08/16 03:31:47 PDT > > > > Modified files: > > sys/netinet ip_fw2.c > > sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw2.c > > Log: > > sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c: > > > > Implement the M_SKIP_FIREWALL bit in m_flags to avoid loops > > for firewall-generated packets (the constant has to go in sys/mbuf.h). > > Every commit you make to ipfw causes it so that a newer kernel cannot be > used with a week old userland (and vice-versa). With the poor shape of > -CURRENT this makes it very hard to use -CURRENT as one cannot even test > a new kernel for usability before irreversabily updating world. > > Could you *please* queue up your changes over a longer period of time and > hold off any more IPFW commits for a while? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message