From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 11 15:52:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 736271065672 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087E38FC1D for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so403111fxg.13 for ; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ry4Uy1eqkFUWscjdJETvDxpxJkEwBgWmVa7OiaPEWMQ=; b=QI44Wi0DnWoHls416/KqG5hqSoqPCrpsn10+kIZjwxh6oBN+pZWa+M7IIdnygyt78K C45UKrfYEok7b9morkGHwa25J4JvoyQ6txvPeBsy41wFC7XyLqZ4RSEVlNkx4pep2kch pXCdnKKEbWrfolpwu4/+9cvvwq7InhLU7z9ow= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.88.23 with SMTP id y23mr1691690fal.95.1315756358895; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.6.193 with HTTP; Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:52:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110911113109.GA81577@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20110901223646.14b8aae8@o2.pl> <4E60DBBD.1040703@FreeBSD.org> <4E679D3D.1000007@FreeBSD.org> <4E6B1285.70508@FreeBSD.org> <4E6B1AD4.6080206@FreeBSD.org> <4E6B320A.4090606@FreeBSD.org> <20110910110310.GA6263@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4E6C71FA.50906@FreeBSD.org> <20110911113109.GA81577@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:52:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Scot Hetzel To: Peter Jeremy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: i/o error - all block copies unavailable after upgrading to r225312 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 15:52:40 -0000 On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > In any case, size isn't an issue for any of gptboot, gptzfsboot or > zfsboot (unlike boot2). =A0For that matter, why do we need both > gptboot and gptzfsboot? =A0It would be more convenient to have a > single GPT bootstrap that handled both UFS & ZFS. > gptzfsboot contains CDDL licensed code. This was done to allow users to build/install FreeBSD without any CDDL licensed boot code. Scot