From owner-freebsd-small Mon Jan 24 2:21:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from horus.co.jyu.fi (horus.co.jyu.fi [192.130.143.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510E214E4C for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 02:21:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trossi@horus.co.jyu.fi) Received: (from trossi@localhost) by horus.co.jyu.fi (8.9.1a/8.9.1/NO UCE/antispam-19991216-1 [tjko@horus.co.jyu.fi]) id MAA05040; Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:20:24 +0200 Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:20:24 +0200 From: Timo Rossi To: Greg Lehey Cc: small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New approach to picobsd Message-ID: <20000124122024.A4574@horus.co.jyu.fi> References: <3888D5CF.329989@achtung.com> <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <20000122145538.A390@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 02:55:38PM +0800, Greg Lehey wrote: > The real issue is: do we want a one-disk PicoBSD or a two-disk PicoBSD > (in fact, it's one-disk or multi-disk)? One disk is becoming What about embedded systems with small amounts of flash memory with hard disk emulation (for example an IDE-flashdisk with a few megabytes capacity)? Is PicoBSD the right choice to those situations at all? Or is it strictly for floppy-based systems? -- // Timo Rossi , // To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message