From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 22:15:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99793106564A; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from gritton.org (gritton.org [161.58.222.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61CE58FC08; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from guppy.corp.verio.net (fw.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by gritton.org (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m9TLmg35096991; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:48:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <4908DA35.7070905@gritton.org> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:48:37 -0600 From: James Gritton User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" References: <487086DA-4514-44E7-AB9F-F1D98C652980@yellowspace.net> <49078377.2090807@smartt.com> <20081029072821.S2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20081029072821.S2978@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.93, clamav-milter version 0.93 on gritton.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.x and multiple IPs in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:15:41 -0000 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > The plan as the status report will say is to get this in, merge it to > stable/7 before 7.2 and keep it in 8. > > 8 will also have vimages and ideally I'd like to see this entire jail > IP hacks be gone for 9, when vimage will provide the infrastructure, > etc. This means that 8 would be the transition period. But that's > just me and my ideas - we'll see how it'll go. I'm not convinced vimage is the only kind of network virtualization we want to give the option of. The IP addresses assigned to jails seems a lighter weight alternative, and allows some things that vimage doesn't do easily, such as system processes that listen on the virtual addresses for some services, leaving the jail to handle others. - Jamie