From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 02:59:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080B516A4CE for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C37B43D5A for ; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 02:59:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2UAxmZl048272; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:59:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2UAxmHG048271; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:59:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:59:48 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040330105948.GA48082@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav , current@freebsd.org References: <20040328182314.GA99956@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330093548.GA46139@nagual.pp.ru> <20040330103119.GA47518@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.24.0.7; VDF 6.24.0.75 (host: pobrecita.freebsd.ru) cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mtree -L is broken due to unneded type=link additions to BSD.*.dist X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:59:51 -0000 On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:51:29PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > People use scripts to create empty directory structures so they can > compare before / after file lists to generate plists. I understand it, but I see no difference in before / after file lists with your patch or without. Could you please demonstrate situation you talk about in some simple example I can check step-by-step? I.e. I not state that problem you mention not exists, but your patch not fix it too, at least in bsd.port.mk, just because it does nothing which not already done by bsd.port.mk Alternatvely, do you mean direct mtree calls by ports themselfs (i.e. bypassing bsd.port.mk)? In this situation ports should be fixed to use bsd.port.mk instead. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/